Pages

Showing posts with label J.I Packer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label J.I Packer. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Covenant Theology In Scriptures


In his excellent introduction to the reprint of the classic, "The Economy of the Covenants between God and Man: Comprehending A Complete Body of Divinity" by Herman Witsius, renowned Anglican theologian J.I Packer enlists four features of the Bible, by which it forces its readers to covenantal thinking. They are :

First, by the story that it tells. The books of the Bible, from Genesis to Revelation, are, as was said earlier, God's own record of the progressive unfolding of his purpose to have a people in covenant with himself here on earth. The covenantal character of God's relationships with human beings, first to last, has already been underlined, and is in fact reflected one way and another on just about every page of the Bible. The transition in Eden from the covenant of works to the covenant of grace, and the further transition from all that was involved in the preliminary (old) form of that covenant to its final (new) form, brought in through the death of Jesus Christ and now administered by him from his throne, are the key events in the covenant story. The significance of the fact that God caused his book of instruction to mankind to be put together with the history of his covenant as its backbone can hardly be overestimated. Covenant relationships between God and men, established by God's initiative, bringing temporal and eternal blessings to individuals and creating community among them, so that they have a corporate identity as God's people, are in fact the pervasive themes of the whole Bible; and it compels thoughtful readers to take note of the covenant as being central to God's concern.

Second, Scripture forces covenant theology upon us by the place it gives to Jesus Christ in the covenant story. That all Scripture, one way and another, is pointing its readers to Christ, teaching us truths and showing us patterns of divine action that help us understand him properly, is a principle that no reverent and enlightened Bible student will doubt. This being so, it is momentously significant that when Jesus explained the memorial rite for himself that he instituted as his people's regular form of worship, he spoke of the wine that they were to drink as symbolizing his blood, shed to ratify the new covenant -- a clear announcement of the fulfilling of the pattern of Exodus 24 (Jesus echoes directly the words of verse 8) and the promise of Jeremiah 31:31-34. It is also momentously significant that when the writer to the Hebrews explains the uniqueness and finality of Jesus Christ as the only source of salvation for sinners he does so by focusing on Jesus as the mediator of the new covenant and depicts him as establishing this prophesied relationship between God and his people by superseding (transcending and thereby cancelling) the inadequate old covenant institutions for dealing with sins and giving access to God. It is also momentously significant that when in Galatians Paul tells Gentiles that their faith in Christ, as such, has already made them inheritors of all that was promised to Abraham, he makes the point by declaring that in union with Christ, as those who by baptism have "put on" the Christ in whom they have trusted so as to become his own people, they are now the seed of Abraham with whom God has made his covenant for all time (Gal. 3) . . . the covenant that brings liberty from law as a supposed system of salvation and full fellowship for ever with God above (Gal. 4:24-3 1). Such Scriptures require us to interpret Christ in terms of God's covenant, just as they require us to interpret God's covenant in terms of Christ, and this fact also alerts thoughtful readers to the centrality of the covenant theme.

The third way in which Scripture directs us to covenantal thinking is by the specific parallel between Christ and Adam that Paul draws in Rom. 5:12-18; 1 Cor. 15: 21 f., 45-49). The solidarity of one person standing for a group, involving the whole group in the consequences of his action and receiving promises that apply to the whole group as well as to himself, is a familiar facet of biblical covenant thought, usually instanced in the case of family and national groups (Noah, Gen. 6:18, 9:9; Abraham, Gen. 17:7; the Israelites, Ex. 20:4-6, 8-12, 31:12-17 (16); Aaron, Lev. 24:8 f.;Phinehas, Num. 25:13; David, 2 Chr. 13:5, 21:7; Jer. 33:19-22). In Rom. 5:12-1 8 Paul proclaims a solidarity between Christ and his people (believers, Rom 3:22-5:2; the elect, God's chosen ones, 8:33) whereby the law-keeping, sin-bearing obedience of "the one man" brings righteousness with God, justification, and life to "the many," "all;" and he sets this within the frame of a prior solidarity, namely that between Adam and his descendants, whereby our entire race was involved in the penal consequences of Adam's transgression. The 1 Corinthians passages confirm that these are indeed covenantal solidarities; God deals with mankind through two representative men, Adam and Christ; all that are in Adam die; all that are in Christ are made alive. This far-reaching parallel is clearly foundational to Paul's understanding of God's ways with our race, and it is a covenantal way of thinking, showing from a third angle that covenant theology is indeed biblically basic.

The fourth way in which Scripture forces covenant theology upon us is by the explicit declaring of the covenant of redemption, most notably (though by no means exclusively) in the words of Jesus recorded in the gospel of John. All Jesus's references to his purpose in the world as the doing of his Father's will, and to his actual words and works as obedience to his Father's command (Jn. 4:32-34, 5:30, 6:38-40, 7:16-18, 8:28 f., 12:49 f., 14:31, 15:10, 17:4, I9:30); all his further references to his being sent by the Father into the world to perform a specific task (Jn. 3:17, 34, 5:23, 30, 36, 38, 6:29, 57, 7:28, 29, 33, 8:16, 18, 26, 9:4, 10:36, 11:42, 12:44, 13:20, 14:24, 15:21, 16:5, 17:3, 8,18, 21, 23, 25, 20:21, cf. 18:37); and all his references to the Father "giving" him particular persons to save, and to his acceptance of the task of rescuing them from perishing both by dying for them and by calling and shepherding them to glory (Jn. 6:37-44, 10:14-16, 27-30, 17:2, 6, 9,19, 22, 24); are so many testimonies to the reality of the covenant of redemption. The emphasis is pervasive, arresting, and inescapable: Jesus' own words force on thoughtful readers recognition of the covenant economy as foundational to all thought about the reality of God's saving grace.  [1]

Footnotes  
----------------
[1]  J.I Packer, "The Economy of the Covenants between God and Man: Comprehending A Complete Body of Divinity". Herman Witsius. REPRENTED 1990. Escondido. California: The den Dulk Christian Foundation.

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

Evangelicals and Annihilationism


Annihilationism is the belief that sinners are destroyed, rather than tormented forever in "hell" as in the lake of fire. It is directly related to the doctrine of conditional immortality, the idea that a human soul is not immortal unless it is given eternal life. Annihilationism asserts that God will eventually destroy or annihilate the wicked, leaving only the righteous to live on in immortality. Some annihilationists believe the wicked will be punished for their sins in the lake of fire before being annihilated, others that hell is a false doctrine of pagan origin. [1]

Though a minority view, some Protestant and Anglican writers holds this view. Annihilationism seems to be gaining as a legitimate minority opinion within modern, conservative Protestant theology since the 1960s, and particularly since the 1980s. It has found support and acceptance among some British evangelicals, although viewed with greater suspicion by their American counterparts. Recently, a handful of evangelical theologians, including the prominent evangelical Anglican author John Stott, have offered at least tentative support for the doctrine, touching off a heated debate within mainstream evangelical Christianity.[2]

Stott advocated the view in the 1988 book Essentials: A Liberal-Evangelical Dialogue with liberal David Edwards, the first time he publicly did so.[3] However 5 years later he said he had held this view for around fifty years.[4] Stott wrote, "Well, emotionally, I find the concept intolerable and do not understand how people can live with it without either cauterising their feelings or cracking under the strain."[5] Yet he considers emotions unreliable, and affords supreme authority to the Bible.[6] Stott supports annihilation, yet cautions, "I do not dogmatise about the position to which I have come. I hold it tentatively... I believe that the ultimate annihilation of the wicked should at least be accepted as a legitimate, biblically founded alternative to their eternal conscious torment.[7]

J.I Packer, the well known Anglican theologian offers a review of Evangelical Annihilationism in his article “Evangelical Annihilationism in Review”.  In it after briefly dealing with what Evangelicalism is and making two theological and pastoral caveats, Packer enlists four common arguments made in favor of Annihilationism. To each of these arguments Packer makes his brief responses too.

Evangelical Annihilationism in Review   Read  | Download pdf

Footnotes
--------------
[1] Annihilationism, Wikipedia
[2] John Stott: A Global Ministry by Timothy Dudley-Smith, p353
[3] Essentials: A Liberal-Evangelical Dialogue by David L. Edwards with a response from John Stott. 1988, p314 [313–320]
[4] In 1993. John Stott: A Global Ministry, p354
[5] Essentials, p314
[6] Essentials, p314–15
[7] Essentials, p320

Monday, November 22, 2010

Puritan Style of Preaching

In an introduction to one of his sermons preached in 1967, J.I Packer gives 5 essential characteristics of Puritan preaching as follows :

“What do you mean by preaching in the Puritan style? I would tell you what I take it to mean.

  1. Preaching in the Puritan style is preaching that is expository. The Puritans sought to be expositors first and last. Opening texts was their phrase for it, bringing out the treasures hidden in the various texts of the Word of God.
  2. Preaching in the Puritan style is preaching that is doctrinal. The Puritans believed that texts teach truths and the preacher’s business is to find those truths and display them so that people may learn them.
  3. Preaching in the Puritan style is preaching that is contemporary.  There never were preachers more directly contemporary than the Puritans. One of them said this “it’s a cheap zeal that declaimeth against the errors of yesterday”. And it would be a cheap zeal on my part if I simply aped the Puritans when God has set me to preach the Word to you today.   
  4. Preaching in the Puritan style is preaching that is applicatory.  The Puritans sought to get inside their hearers, they sought to use the Word of God in order to search their hearts. They believed that one reason why God has given us His truth was so that we might know ourselves as we are in His presence; as He knows us. The sought to apply the Word in such a way that their congregations would know themselves. Also in such a way that their congregations would feel the healing power of truth, of those particular places of need and trouble, the sore places, the bruised places in their own consciences and in their own hearts.
  5. Preaching in the Puritan style is preaching that is (if I might try to reclaim an abused phrase) honest to God. Much preaching today, I believe is not honest to God. It is not honest to God in its matter. It does not declare God’s whole counsel. It soft peddles God’s holiness and His severity. That is abusing the Word of God. Much preaching today, I believe is equally failing to be honest to God in its manner.  Its sentimental and cheapening holy things.  Oh its brilliant and thereby calling attention to the preacher rather than to the Lord. The Puritans lead us out of these into honest preaching. The preaching of those who have sought to hear the Word of God and now stand before congregations to declare what they have heard.
This to be sure is what I mean by preaching in the Puritan style. You can see that it is only by the grace of God that anyone ever succeeds in preaching in the Puritan style. If a man ever does, he ought to be very thankful.” [1]

Amen, may God raise up such preachers in our day for His glory.

Footnotes
----------------------
[1] Sermon entitled “Romans 7&8” by J.I Packer



Tuesday, November 16, 2010

Puritan Understanding of Sanctification

Dr. J.I Packer gives a thorough explanation of the Puritan witness to the doctrine and practice of sanctification in this three part lecture series. Packer initially lays some general guidelines on how we should learn from Puritans or any other group of Christians of a bygone age. He starts with warning us on merely imitating the Puritans in their diction or dense speech. He rather exhorts us to apply the same truths in our age. Through out this series, Packer is characterized by a nuanced approach, which as always is the mark of a true scholar. He does not have any presupposition that the Puritans are always right in what they say, but rather seeks to weigh everything in light of the Scriptures. He calls his preaching a Biblical Historical method of preaching. In the end he does vindicate the teachings of the Puritans and calls it a classic. Through out this series, he takes mainly one Puritan – John Owen, whom he considers to be the greatest of all Puritans as the Puritan spokesperson for their understanding of sanctification. 

The first in the series is an introduction to the theme of sanctification and so it is simply entitled “What is Sanctification”. Packer begins by unpacking what the shorter and larger Westminster Catechism says on sanctification. He then moves on to the Westminster confession and then to the Scriptures. This lecture is a very good introduction to this whole series.

In the second lecture, Packer concentrates on “Sanctification and the Fight”. Here he concentrates on why there is a fight involved in progressive sanctification. He first explains the reasons for the presence of this fight.  For this he takes Owen’s writings on indwelling sin, Satan and our fallen bodies. The second part of this lecture then concentrates on how we can effectively fight. It is presented in military terms and is very practical and useful in one’s private battle against sin. Here again it is Owen's brilliant exposition and practical wisdom that is used by Packer. 

The final lecture is titled “Assurance and Conduct” and focuses on what the Puritans thought about having “a well grounded assurance”. Here Packer explains from the Scriptures the different aspects of the doctrine of assurance and quotes what the Puritans said about each of these aspects. The precision and care that the Puritans displayed in their pastoral ministry is very evident in this study.

Highly recommend this series for all Christians. 
  
Puritan Understanding of Sanctification

  1. What is Sanctification?  Listen | Download
  2. Sanctification and the Fight  Listen | Download
  3. Sanctification and Assurance  Listen | Download


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...